Thursday, January 21, 2010

husky


Air France to charge obese passengers for two seats

Obese passengers who are unable to squeeze into a single seat on an airliner are to be charged double to fly with Air France.

 
Air France to charge obese passengers for two seats
This picture, on the aviation news website Flightglobal, reignited debate about obese passengers on planes. Photo: FLIGHTGLOBAL
From next month seriously overweight flyers will be asked to pay for two seats, or not be allowed on board for “safety reasons”, the airline announced yesterday.
“People who arrive at the check-in desk and are deemed too large to fit into a single seat will be asked to pay for and use a second seat,” said Monique Matze, an Air France spokesman.
“They will be charged 75 per cent of the cost of the second seat, which is the full price excluding tax and surcharges, on top of the full price for the first.
“The decision has been made for safety reasons. We have to make sure that the backrest can move freely up and down and that all passengers are securely fastened with a seatbelt.”
She added: “People who cannot fit into a single seat will then be fastened by slotting the belt tip of one seat into the plug of the next, stretching over both seats.
“However the charge will only apply on flights that are full booked. They will get their money back on flights where spaces are available.”
Two years ago Air France was ordered to pay £5,000 in damages to a 27-stone passenger who had his stomach measured at an airport check-in desk before being told to buy two seats.
British Airways has no weight limits for passengers, but advises overweight people to buy a second seat for their own comfort and safety if necessary.
Last year a picture, posted the aviation news website, Flightglobal,reignited the debate about obese passengers on aeroplanes.
COMMENTS: 81
  • Air France is not the first airline to do. Southwest already does it. The courts already agreed with Southwest. How about bodybuilders should they pay for a second seat
    tim
    on January 21, 2010
    at 04:54 PM
  • If it's unfair for obese people to pay for two seats, why is it fair for their neighbor to lose their personal space and comfort?
    Doowleb
    on January 21, 2010
    at 04:54 PM
  • Really, I would take it a step further. Why not make the whole thing weight-based? The heavier you are, or your bags, the more fuel it takes to fly the plane to your destination. Why not weigh everyone and their stuff when you pay for tickets? There are only a limited number of seats, though... Maybe a weight-based system worked in with the current pricing system?
    Steven
    on January 21, 2010
    at 04:54 PM
  • This is nothing new, I am a big person and have had to pay for 2 seats to fly on southwest airlines, and air tran. This was a few years ago, but it is common practice on most USA airlines, unless their policys changed.
    big boy
    on January 21, 2010
    at 04:54 PM
  • J Barker...genetic disabilities relating to the obese occur in less than 1% of these cases. I think given that fact, these rules are fine.
    Krys
    on January 21, 2010
    at 04:48 PM
  • This is very fair ..the article indicates that they will be charged only 25% of the second seat. Nobody else qualifies for that kind of discount.
    jimmynotTHATjimmy
    on January 21, 2010
    at 04:48 PM
  • I could be okay with sitting next to a fat person; but I think they should do an FBI background check on anyone flying. I don't want to fly sitting next to a pedophile or a murderer. And they should check for any outstanding warrants. What better time to catch these people when they are confined on a plane. That way they don't have to do those expensive schemes to lure them to some place where they can grab them. Also, I don't like to sit next to young men OR young children. It makes the flight miserable more than anything. The men spend all their time trying to talk to you and the kids cry and scream and wiggle around. Also, BO can be a problem! I hate flying basically but these few things could help.
    susan
    on January 21, 2010
    at 04:47 PM
  • They pay twice as much when they eat twice as much as others, so why do fat people suddenly expect special treatment. You take two, you pay for two.
    dt
    on January 21, 2010
    at 04:24 PM
  • FOR ALL THOSE SAYING THE GREEDY AIRLINES MUST MAKE SEATING BIGGER, CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING. AIRLINES HAVE ONLY A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF SPACE PER PLANE FOR PASSENGERS. IF YOU WANT WIDER SEATS AND MORE LEG ROOM THEN FEWER SEATS WILL BE AVAILABLE PR PLANE. FEWER SEATS MEAN HIGHER PRICES PER PLANE. THE COST OF THE FLIGHT IS THE SAME WHETHER 100 PEOPLE WEIGHING 300 POUNDS FLY OR 200 PEOPLE WEIGHING 150 POUNDS.

    IF YOU WANT MORE SPACE THE AIRLINES ALREADY HAVE THE ANSWER; ITS CALLED FIRST CLASS!!
    Marty E.
    on January 21, 2010
    at 04:24 PM
  • I had a situation on a 10 hour flight where a 400 lb man sat next to me. It was horrible. For one thing, my husband and I had booked on that plane which was supposed to be only two seats on the side rows. We liked this because of the long flight. Air France upped the plane to the ten-seater across.

    The man's legs and arms were so huge that for ten hours I had to lean side ways against my husband. There was no way I could eat meals because the man's arm stuck out over half my seat.

    This man was in effect using over half my seat. I blame Air France.
    Teresa Lewis
    on January 21, 2010
    at 04:24 PM
  • American... What? A larger seat for more money? Duh, they have that already, it's called FIRST CLASS.
    COMN SENSE
    on January 21, 2010
    at 04:18 PM
  • Being fat doesn't happen overnight, and if doesn't happen to people who eat in moderation, careful about what they eat and how many times a day they eat.

    Can't say I feel sorry for the people who are fat. If you are, you created the problem on your own and asking society to accept the fact that being overweight is the norm is absurd.
    Chip
    on January 21, 2010
    at 04:18 PM
  • Daniel wrote: Something has to done. It is only fair. One person who is the size of two should have to pay for two. Try being a nurse having to move these people about when they are sick. It is hard to be sympathetic.

    Is that kinda like "Try being a male nurse"? hahahah
    Vjack
    on January 21, 2010
    at 04:12 PM
  • does this mean that kids or the super petite get to pay half price?
    Hoss
    on January 21, 2010
    at 04:12 PM
  • I hope you skinny cranks get eaten by fat people. I'm 6'6" muscular build and my shoulders will never be 17" wide. However, you little pussycat wimps would be the first to get behind me in an emergency situation. I don't get extra money to be this tall... you PAY to get TRANSPORTED from one place to another, we aren't PARCELS to be measured and charged based on weight.

    What kind of stupid zombie fantasy are you people living.
    V Jack
    on January 21, 2010
    at 04:12 PM
  • While I am empathic to the obese individual, I also see the need to charge for the extra seat. When a person of say 400 pounds gets on an airplane it not only impedes the movement of others seated next to them, but create a situation where more fuel has to be expended. That cost is absorbed by other passengers in the cost of the tickets. Not to mention the safety hazard in the event of having to leave quickly in an emergency. I do think however the airlines could that if there are two such individuals on a flight that they can be put in the same row, and pay only 1.5 of the normal cost. It seems that would be far fairer, and safer than having say 4 such individuals scattered all over the airplane. And there would be even a few people on normal weight that might be inclined to pay the extra cost to gain half a seat next to them as extra room, and privacy.
    enigmaforever
    on January 21, 2010
    at 04:06 PM
  • For once France is doing something right! Unfortunately, it would never fly (no pun intended) in my country as the courts would probably rule such a measure discriminatory (although one person paying for the price of one seat and getting two isn't fair).
    While some individuals have a natural propensity toward being overweight (and even obese), I don't see how it is possible to get anywhere near this level of obesity by eating even a moderately healthy diet and getting a low amount of exercise. To get to this level of obesity, one has to pretty much make eating their hobby - and by this, I don't mean "fine dining" but eating lots of unhealthy foods, where "lunch" would consist of foods from four different fast-food joints.
    I have a lack of sympathy for those who get discriminated against due to being so overweight (when the situation is appropriate) - it is largely a self-control issue, hence, a character issue.
    These seats are designed to fit individuals who have acceptable weights and body sizes. Although I am somewhat overweight, I still have a bit of wiggle room when I get into an airline seat.
    Mr Happy Man
    on January 21, 2010
    at 04:06 PM
  • William, obese people are in no way like disabled people. Disabled people have mental or physical problems that cannot be prevented, treated, and is most likely not their fault. Obese people have only themselves to blame for being obese. For you to compare a person who has a mental illness with a person who eats too much and does not exercise shows a complete lack of judgment and character, and I hope you are never in a position to affect public policy in any country. Obese people should not be "accomodated." Other than their weight, these people are perfectly normal individuals. To "accomodate" would be discrimination against individuals who are not obese.
    William you are wrong
    on January 21, 2010
    at 04:06 PM
  • OK...HERE IS A BETTER SOLUTION TO THIS PROBLEM.........

    THE AIRLINES SHOULD TAKE A SECTION (BE IT RANDOM OR NOT) AND PULL THOSE BABY SIZE SEATS OUT AND PUT IN LARGER SEATS. WHERE THERE IS NORMALLY 3 SEATS, PUT 2 IN AND CHARGE EXTRA FOR THE LARGER SEATS. NOW HERE IS WHERE IT WOULDN'T BE A REVENUE LOSS; SOME FAMILIES, INDIVIDUALS WOULD LOVE TO SIT IN ROOMIER SEATS AND WOULD PAY A LITTLE EXTRA FOR THEM. THIS WOULD ELIMINATE SPILLING OVER, INTRUSION AND EMBARASSMENT FOR OBESE PASSENGERS.
    AMERICAN
    on January 21, 2010
    at 03:57 PM
  • Jessica, we are not all little fascists who want to destroy fat people. You obviously have been reading the comments uncarefully. What people are saying is quite simple. If I pay for a seat on an airplne, there is a real possibility of my seat (that I paid alot of money for) being taken up partially by an obese person who cannot fit in their own seat. We are not talking about not letting obese people on the plane. What the article is talking about is making obese people who cannot fit into their own seat pay (possibly) for the second seat they are occupying. If you cannot understand that, then you are either a really obese person in denial of the problem, you have never experienced the phenomenon, or you simply have no empathy for those who have.

    Secondly, a person pays for the space they take up on the airplane. The airlines have made seats in such dimensions that reasonably allows the average person enough space to sit for a flight, and for many people a seat is more than enough space. Airlines cannot simply make all of their seats bigger (because the average person does not need a bigger seat), and they should not have a section on the airplane to accomodate larger people (because they would be singled out and forced to sit in their own "obese section") which many would consider discrimination. However, airlines should be allowed to charge people for the space they take up on the airplane. If a person is large enough where he/she needs more than the dimensional space that the airlines can reasonably provide to the average individual, then they should have to pay for it. I myself am overweight, and if the day ever came that I could not fit myself into an airplane seat, I would not cry foul if the airline made me pay for an extra seat; if anything it would be a wake-up call.

    As a law student, I can't wait for the day when airlines across the globe begin instituting this kind of policy. Inevitably, there will be mass lawsuits, and possibly even a class-action. I would love to defend the airline if it ever came to that. ...If there was a class action, I wonder how all the obese people would get to the site where the suit was commenced... would they fy?
    Jessica is wrong
    on January 21, 2010
    at 03:57 PM
  • Something has to done. It is only fair. One person who is the size of two should have to pay for two. Try being a nurse having to move these people about when they are sick. It is hard to be sympathetic.
    daniel
    on January 21, 2010
    at 03:53 PM
  • "What if their obesity is caused by a genetic disability? Surely this is discrimination against the disabled?"

    Does this refer to the legendry "unable to say no to pies" gene?
    Peter Strong
    on January 21, 2010
    at 03:53 PM
  • While deploring the mean-spirited comments of the lifestyle nazis, I have to agree this policy does make sense.

    If I were large enough to require two seats, I'd want them for my own comfort. Larger people pay more for clothing because more material is needed to create it, and I don't see indignant reactions to that. Fact of life. Same with seat space.
    Cloudy
    on January 21, 2010
    at 03:53 PM
  • Airlines arent greedy - its a cut throat competitive business and few make significant profits. How come I can fly to Bangkok for the same price as the train to Inverness? Economy seats are small because so is the price. If people cant fit in the choices are one either upgrade or dont travel. Expecting to pay for a mini but get a strwetch limo just because you've over eaten doesnt wash.
    tim
    on January 21, 2010
    at 03:53 PM
  • Airlines should charge "per seat," not "per person." All of these people's testimonies of misery next to an obese person states the case clearly. This is common sense.
    Simon
    on January 21, 2010
    at 03:53 PM
  • I am a large woman. I travel a great deal for my job. The airline seat "fit" test keeps me from growing larger. If the time comes where I can no longer fit into one seat, I would expect to pay for 2 seats and not complain one bit. Fatties don't complain that they have to purchase big cars (which are more expensive) to accommodate them, why complain about an extra fare. You go, Air France!!!!
    Kitty, Atlanta, GA USA
    on January 21, 2010
    at 03:46 PM
  • Seems like an excellent idea to me, Air France. Indeed, I think EVERY airline should have the same policy.
    DocChuck
    on January 21, 2010
    at 03:46 PM
  • France is just laughing all the way to the bank. Most of their obese customers are most likely to be American's anyway! I'm sure the ACLoonitics would get involved if this were implemented on US airlines.

    I do agree, even thin/those with a normal BMI are already squeezed into chairs, especially those that are tall like me. Last thing I want is someone violating my personal space and possibly threatening safety of passengers.
    LA
    on January 21, 2010
    at 03:46 PM
  • So what? Personally im not even close to fat much less obese but i think of one hundred other places id rather visit than France.
    ra44mr2
    on January 21, 2010
    at 03:46 PM
  • When another airline tried this, an obese office mate told me he was offended airlines would charge obese people double just becuase they were "different". LOL. Its not like they are charging flyers differently according to race, color or creed. Nope, just bulk.
    Chili
    on January 21, 2010
    at 03:45 PM
  • Well done, Air France.
    Lufthansa, take note!
    karinnska
    on January 21, 2010
    at 03:43 PM
  • I am a large person, height and weight.. but.. my butt and my belly fit within the narrow confines of a typical airline seat.. my problem is my shoulders are wider (which is not something my weight affects) by several inches.. hence causing some encroachment into the next seat space.. nothing i can do about that, oh ye who say "lose weight".. in fact most passengers I see pretty well fill the seatback void edge to edge, other than children and some very dainty women.. perhaps if the airlines DID go to the wider seats pictured in the aircraft manufacturers ads it might help.. as well as spacing them out further apart front to back so I dont have to cram my 6'3 knees into the seat in front of me.. get very dirty looks there too when they try and slam the seat back to recline and my knees are in their way.. or i bounce them right back for encroaching MY space
    Big Man
    on January 21, 2010
    at 03:43 PM
  • Childern that make alot of noise should be charged extra too.
    Jasper
    on January 21, 2010
    at 03:43 PM
  • Obese passengers should be treated as those with a disability...accommodated. Airlines need to understand seating is not one-size fits all. Obese discrimination is as wrong as race/sex/orientation discrimination.
    William
    on January 21, 2010
    at 03:43 PM
  • Geeze, if we go down this slippery slope of judgement ( instead of accommodations ) then shouldn't a small person or child be charged a smaller fee for the seat. After all, this policy is based on size!!
    Ray D
    on January 21, 2010
    at 03:43 PM
  • I have flown around the world a couple of times, and have had tolerate flab invading my airspace. It is uncomforable and annoying when their heat and moisture affect your personal space. Not only should they be charged, but women that have the bladders the size of a pea should be charged for excessive disruptions when going to the loo. There should be special rated for climbers that are so important they have to work on their laptops during a three hour flight, bumping you the whole time with their elbows. Additionally, the airlines should REWARD good behavior. Passengers that make as little of a footprint during their travels should gain points towards upgrades out of steerage.
    Curtis
    on January 21, 2010
    at 03:43 PM
  • Let them eat cake.
    Marie Antoinette
    on January 21, 2010
    at 03:13 PM
  • Do they get two meals?

    Way to go Air France. Over the years I have had numerous obese people spill over into my seating space. Their sweating, unwashed rolls of fat protrude over and under the armrest. Tree trunk legs are splayed onto my floor space. Mammoth arms, resting on encrusted armpits shoving me into the adjacent seat.

    Hey people, lay off the Big Macs!

    Seriously, obese people are a hazard on airplanes. Imagine you are behind one during an emergency evacuation.
    Dutra
    on January 21, 2010
    at 03:13 PM
  • Airline passengers unite! We are sick and tired of being squeezed into seats meant for a child. We are baby boomers much larger and a hell of alot taller than the previous generation who these seats were designed for. They are charging outrageous rates expecting us to not complain. They have packed seats inches in front of us. We cannot all afford 1rst class seating they should make management sit in these intolerable seats for over 3 hours and see how they feel!
    blubberbutt
    on January 21, 2010
    at 03:09 PM
  • Airline passengers unite! We are sick and tired of being squeezed into seats meant for a child. We are baby boomers much larger and a hell of alot taller than the previous generation who these seats were designed for. They are charging outrageous rates expecting us to not complain. They have packed seats inches in front of us. We cannot all afford 1rst class seating they should make management sit in these intolerable seats for over 3 hours and see how they feel!
    blubberbutt
    on January 21, 2010
    at 03:09 PM
  • Imagine if a movie theater was full, and you had someone spilling into your seat. How would you feel? You paid the same price, but get 2/3 of a seat, and the heavy person gets 1 and 1/3 seats. You should get what you pay for, and Air France does not stand to profit from this new policy as it is laid out here.
    Helen
    on January 21, 2010
    at 03:09 PM
  • Stop using these greedy airlines. The seats are a torture object even for normal people.
    Daniel Stein
    on January 21, 2010
    at 02:49 PM
  • Only charging on full flights? What are they going to do? If they sell another seat, then the thin passenger gets bumped. Or, are they just going to charge the fat person and then say the flight is full and we cannot give you another seat? Are they going to bump the fat passenger?

    Certainly, the obese person's intrusion into the normal sized person's space is a problem. Every normal sized person who has ever flown next to an obese person can so attest. The solution may require people over a certain weight or girth buying two seats up front and getting reimbursed for a portion if the flight is not full.
    Doc
    on January 21, 2010
    at 02:47 PM
  • I have had to deal with an obese person next to me on more than one flight. One was a 7 hour flight, the person takes up part of my seat which does not work for me. Of course I would move but it was a sold out flight. The same thing happened a few weeks ago, another sold out flight with someone sitting on top of me. If they had 2 seats they would not need mine.
    kb
    on January 21, 2010
    at 02:45 PM
  • Viktor,

    Guy is not a giant. He doesn't fit in the seat and is straddling the armrest in that photo which is the reason he looks much taller as well. He probably is a little taller than the man to his right but shouldn't be much more taller.
    Randy
    on January 21, 2010
    at 02:20 PM
  • Wait a second, what everyone is missing is that it is the guy in the MIDDLE seat who's shoulder is actually encroaching on his large seatmate to the left of him. Should he also be required to pay for two seats? How about we demand that airlines go to 22" wide seating standard, and enough leg room to accomodate 7' tall people. I am 6' 5" and get ripped off buying 1st class tickets so that my knees don't have indentations in them every time I fly from the arm rests in front of me.
    Big guy
    on January 21, 2010
    at 02:19 PM
  • I recently flew Air France to Paris from Boston, and had an obese person sitting next to me. They had her board last and unfortunately had the seat next to mine an aisle seat, I was in the middle. She needed an extension to her seatbelt, she requested not to put the arm rest down between us, so that she could "spill" into my seat. Yes, obese people who take up two seats should pay for two seats. It will be a very long time before flying Air France ever again.
    Independent Thinker
    on January 21, 2010
    at 02:19 PM
  • He is not taller, he has to sit on the armrest because he can't fit between them.
    James
    on January 21, 2010
    at 02:16 PM
  • This issue does involve money, but it does not necessarily involve greed. In the period immediately following 9/11/01, shutting down airlines for just several days resulted in several of them going into bankruptcy. This is not an extremely cost-efficient and high-profit margin business. Continuously giving away free seats and/or running flights with far less than full capacity puts a strain on the airlines to meet costs. This is also why the airlines cram seats with such small space into such a small area. They need to sell as many as possible to meet costs. As uncomfortable as these tiny seats are, if we all demand significantly bigger seats with significantly more room, we'll either have to pay significantly more for a seat or have the airline go out of business.

    Furthermore, this is NOT discrimination against the obese. Let's put the shoe on the other foot for a second. If someone is going to claim that obese people should pay the same price as everyone else and get an extra seat, I say that is discrimination against people who are NOT obese. If I'm not obese, and an obese person and I each pay $500 for sitting in the same section on the same flight, why should he/she get two seats for his/her $500 but I only get one seat for mine? That's discrimination. If you want to say it is not, then should we also demand that grocery stores and restaurants sell food at a discount to obese people? After all, if an obese person requires twice as much food as I do, should he/she be able to get twice the amount of food as me for the same price?
    Reality Check
    on January 21, 2010
    at 02:15 PM
  • It will be interesting to see if this applies to professional athletes, too. I remember sitting in the middle seat once in a plane between two big college students, and both of them spread into my seat.

    Something doesn't make sense, though. They said the charge only applies to flights that are fully booked. But, if they're fully booked, then how can the obese person get two seats in a row?

    But, I agree with the person who said to weigh passengers and luggage. For instance, I always travel light and never have more than a carry on size bag. Yet the guy with two or three suitcases probably has 50-75 pounds more than me.
    carolb
    on January 21, 2010
    at 02:10 PM
  • I flew on a flight once where the body of the fellow sitting next me me hung over both armrests and well into the two seats on either side of him. There are lots of good reasons to force that person to buy two seats. As a passenger, the main reason to me is to make life bearable for those sitting next to them.
    Rick
    on January 21, 2010
    at 02:07 PM
  • Geez people, look at how your talking. Why don't we just get rid of all the FAT people of the world so we can all be perfect and skinny. That is of course what truely matters in life. Seriously, let's line them up Hitler style and take em down. Then we can all be happy. NONE of you have a right to judge someone who is overweight!
    Jessica
    on January 21, 2010
    at 02:06 PM
  • it's about time....if I buy a seat, i want my seat, i didn't buy a seat to share.....
    jeff
    on January 21, 2010
    at 01:52 PM
  • It's unfair for normal sized people to have to give up some of the space they paid for so that fat people can squeeze in without paying extra. This change makes a LOT of sense, I just wish it extended to other venues such as movie theaters and so on.

    That having been said - if the flight isn't full, and the total weight of person + luggage falls under some maximum, then he shouldn't be charged extra. Nobody needs the extra seat, and the fat person isn't taking up extra weight. On the other end of things, people who are huge but NOT fat should be charged for extra seats as well, since this is a size and weight issue, not a health issue per se.

    Seriously, people - fat is almost always self-inflicted, and size gives you natural advantages in life that small people would be more than willing to pay a bit extra for. No use complaining either way, pay your fee and move on.
    TJP
    on January 21, 2010
    at 01:52 PM
  • That's a half-assed plan if I ever heard one. ; )
    Jasonn
    on January 21, 2010
    at 01:52 PM
  • Oh how I wish more airlines would be brave enough to take this stance. PC bull be damned. I have a 17 year old son who is 6ft. 3in. tall and still growing but is quite trim, underweight actually at around 140-maybe 150 lbs. with only a 29 inch waist, and while it is tough for him to fit his legs but he definitely does not spill over the seat into the neighboring seats when he flies. We try to book seats where there is no-one in front of him whenever possible which offers a bit more leg room, now if he were obese and tall that would be a different story.
    LjPhoto
    on January 21, 2010
    at 01:42 PM
  • I don't care what the overweight say, eating less and moving more results in weight loss. Therefore the obese just like smokers have control over their drug of choice..food. Pay for 2 seats, lose weight or forego flying.
    Kathy
    on January 21, 2010
    at 01:35 PM
  • Air France is right on this one. When I buy a ticket, I pay a price and in return I get a certain amount of space on the flight. When the person next to me cannot fit into their space, why do they think they are entitled to mine?
    DC
    on January 21, 2010
    at 01:33 PM
  • Given a large proportion of the cost of any flight must be the fuel, it makes sense that you should pay more for your ticket the heavier you are (as the plane uses more fuel to shift the load). Better still, by giving people a total weight allowance that covers baggage as well as the weight of the individual, this ultimately becomes fairer for everyone.

    Despite being in favour of the airlines plans here, it doesnt detract from the reality that most airlines dont provide adequate space on their planes for 'bigger' people (height and weight).

    If the airlines are going to go down the route of charging for weight, there should be some responsibilty taken on their part to make the seats wider and increase leg room so that the extra money paid results in extra comfort.

    As it stands, this just sounds like a revenue raising tactic from the airlines and is unlikely to mean more comfortable travel for anyone.
    daniel wright
    on January 21, 2010
    at 01:26 PM
  • AF is doing exactly the right thing provided they have the flexibility/reasonableness to not charge if the flight is less-than-full and the passenger is therefore not taking revenue away from the carrier. "Fattie's Rights" do not trump passenger safety when it comes to making sure that the aisles are free and clear as they would not be in the photo above.
    Henry Cave Devine
    on January 21, 2010
    at 12:24 PM
  • Just had a second thought. If two [ or more]thin people can fit into an Air France seat, can they fly on one ticket? Reminds me of how many people can you squeeze in a Mini !
    John Harrison
    on January 21, 2010
    at 11:45 AM
  • About time too!
    I recently spent an 8-hour flight sandwiched between two huge gentlemen who both not only monopolised the armrests but overflowed several inches into 'my space'. It was incredibly uncomfortable, claustrophobic and made eating in-flight meals impossible. I asked the cabin crew to change seat but was told there was none available (I wasn't offered an upgrade!).
    They were nice enough guys and I wouldn't wish to persecute them but if I found myself in the same position again, I would refuse to fly.
    John
    on January 21, 2010
    at 11:39 AM
  • At check in there is a frame to check cabin bagage is not too large. Suggest airlines put an airline seat next to it and if anyone does not fit into it, then they pay for two seats.

    Simple really !
    John Harrison
    on January 21, 2010
    at 11:37 AM
  • An average seat width in economy class these days is 17 Inches, any very large person should be able to logically conclude that they will struggle to fit in to a economy class seat and should take this in to consideration when traveling, especially air travel.

    And like all things in life every thing has its consequences, and just as a very large person needs to buy bigger sized clothes or a bigger sized car, buying two seats or traveling Business/first class has to be also accepted, and is only fair to any person seating in the next seat. They paid their fare and deserve to not be encroached on.
    RajM
    on January 21, 2010
    at 11:32 AM
  • Viktor -
    "Firstly the above picture shows a man who not only is broader than other people, but also proportionally higher. He is simply a giant person. If he were of a normal height, at those proportions he would fit in one seat"
    That man's head is miniscule which demonstrates just how fat he is, he is NOT a giant.
    Helen
    on January 21, 2010
    at 11:12 AM
  • This is definitely a great idea. I once endured a short haul flight next to a person whose huge flab flopped over into my space. It was revolting and I was filled with resentment. In any case, the economics of commercial flight is all about weight. More weight means more fuel, and of course, aircraft have operational weight limits that can not be exceeded. I suggest that tickets should be sold on the basis of a flat charge and then so much per kilogramme for body and baggage weight. That would sort things out and make the hogs pay more.
    Fred Roots
    on January 21, 2010
    at 11:00 AM
  • Viktor - please let me know which airline you use. We have to pay 90% of the full fare plus all the taxes fuel surcharges etc for our 3 year old, who weights around 15kg ...

    Air France - Bravo, about time too. I will certainly fly with you more often if I can.
    Sam
    on January 21, 2010
    at 10:43 AM
  • " If we follow the doctrine that people who are larger pay 75% more, then why aren't children of 7, 8, 9 years of age, half the size of addults, paying only 25% of a normal fare? "

    Maybe cos they are still occupying a full seat, they don't cram the 7,8 years olds etc in two to a seat. The simple fact is if you are too big to fit in a seat and overspill, you are in effect stealing somebody else share of available space.
    frank
    on January 21, 2010
    at 10:25 AM
  • I'm in two minds about the "all-in" weight allowance.

    In general I think it's a decent idea. However, I weigh 90kg and am not really overweight, being 6'2" (well OK, I could do with spending a little more time in the gym, but my BMI is deemed to be fine).

    Is it Ok then to punish tall people in this way, who are already punished by the airlines by having to cram their legs into spaces they just won't fit in (usually behind people that insist on shoving their seat all the way back, even on short flights!)
    Mike N
    on January 21, 2010
    at 10:24 AM
  • I agree with simon coulter’s comment. I have experienced the discomfort of being seated next to a person of elephantine proportions on a long haul flight. They overflowed into my seat and gave off body heat like a hot water boiler.
    Paul
    on January 21, 2010
    at 10:21 AM
  • Thank you, Mr Coulter. I was was subjected to an eight hour flight next to a woman who was half in my seat for the whole flight - so much that I could use only one hand for meals. This is a long overdue measure which should be adopted by all airlines immediately. With increasing rates of obesity, the situation is only going to get worse for 'normal-sized' passengers.
    bakkie
    on January 21, 2010
    at 10:15 AM
  • Viktor - 1 - children do get a discount on flights when traveling with an adult - anything up to 50% - possibly more.
    2 - the seating configuration shown is common on many short-haul flights - the Airbus 320 comes to mind - ref http://www.seatguru.com which shows seating layouts for different airlines and aircraft.
    3 - the man in the photo is large but his proportions suggest he is definitely overweight even for a man of his height.
    4 - the Royal Mail was not decimated by emails - yes the handwritten letter declined but the internet business moved the emphasis of the workload from letters to packets and parcels

    Great idea from Air France - hope all the other airlines follow suit
    Pietor Syzygy
    on January 21, 2010
    at 10:15 AM
  • This move from Air France may seem a great idea to many people, however, i would guess most of them are of average height and build and therefore have no idea of the problems of airtravel for larger folk. Im 28 years old, very fit and active, that said im still 6ft5 and 19stone. This makes those pathetic, narrow, uncomfortable "seats" a nightmare on a long flight, there is no legroom and my shoulders always stick out into the aisle to be hit by passing snack trollys. If the carriers fitted sensible sized seats in the first place this would not be a problem but of course they wouldn't make as much money!
    Nferguson
    on January 21, 2010
    at 10:13 AM

  • Of course airlines cramming ever more smaller seats into an already cramped space wouldn't have anything to do with it ...would it?
    JOHN ELWIN
    on January 21, 2010
    at 09:53 AM
  • Why not start an airline "Fat Air" for fat people and "Annorex Air" for the thin? The costs of one could be offset by the other!!!!
    BarkingMark
    on January 21, 2010
    at 09:44 AM
  • Being fat is not a disease. It is simply the result of eating and drinking too many calories and not exrcising sufficiently to burn them up. As has been implied, aircraft cannot distinguish between 100kg of human weight or 100kg of luggage. The solution must be to have a statutory all up weight for passengers, including their luggage. If you're fat or want to carry more luggage than the statutory weight limit for your chosen class, then you have to pay more.
    Lizzy
    on January 21, 2010
    at 09:44 AM
  • Good idea from Air France. This would encourage me to fly with them in future. I'd be surprised, however, if the EU doesn't launch an enquiry in to whether this is a reasonable and legal step for Air France to take. Two weeks ago, I had to find myself another seat at the back of the aircraft on a Cathay Pacific flight, because the seat I was allocated was being "used" by another passenger overflowing from his own seat.
    Mark
    on January 21, 2010
    at 09:43 AM
  • It is a safety thing and the relevant international governing authorities should make it compulsory for obese people to buy two seats. If you weigh twice as much it takes around double the fuel to carry that person. The amount of fuel required is directly proportional to the weight the plane must keep airborne. Regular people are currently subsidizing the cost to transport these people. They are also a safety risk in the event of an accident. If they are between you and the exit you're screwed!
    David Torp
    on January 21, 2010
    at 09:32 AM
  • Just a story to relate.

    I was flying in a seat behind a lady flying from the US to Japan on a US carrier - she was large and she was told at check in she had to buy two seats because the airline thought she was too large to fit into a single seat.

    Unfortunately, after the airline insisted she part with the money for the double seats, they only allocated her two seats in a row where the arm rests are fixed and cannot be raised. Useless.

    The stewardesses on board struggled with the situation, but in the end someone kind soul (me) had to give up their seat for the airlines incompetence.

    Not surprisingly she was very embarrassed and absolutely furious.
    CD
    on January 21, 2010
    at 09:32 AM
  • What if their obesity is caused by a genetic disability? Surely this is discrimination against the disabled?
    J Barker
    on January 21, 2010
    at 09:32 AM
  • James
    The French do it because they don't care about PC they just use common sense - sadly lacking in Brown's Britain.
    RL54
    on January 21, 2010
    at 09:30 AM
  • I love to travel with Air France having given up on Heathrow and BA.

    I can fly to C de G from Southampton and fly anywhere I wish.
    Now the experience will be even more enjoyable.

    Well done Air France.

    DNF
    Denis Findlay
    on January 21, 2010
    at 09:30 AM
POST A COMMENT
By submitting any material to us you confirm that you have read, and agree to, our terms and conditions
Your name *
Your email address *

Your Comment *
* = Required information

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home